This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 1237–1246, doi:10.3762/bjnano.6.127
Figure 1: UV–vis absorption spectra of Zn-doped InP QDs.
Figure 2: Experimental X-ray powder diffractogram for synthesized InP QDs with different amounts of Zn dopant....
Figure 3: (a) Bright-field low-magnification TEM image of non-doped InP QDs and its number-weighted size dist...
Figure 4: (a) Low-magnification HAADF-STEM images of Zn/InP QDs and (b–g) selected high-resolution images of ...
Figure 5: (a) EDX spectrum taken from the area of several tens of ODs; (b) HAADF-STEM image and elemental map...
Figure 6: Dependence of UV–vis absorption spectra and PL peak position on Mnom.
Figure 7: (a) Dependence of QY on Mnom; (insert) dependence of Mexp on Mnom, obtained from X-ray fluorescence...
Figure 8: (a) PL spectra of synthesized QDs; (b) normalized PL spectra in energy coordinates.
Figure 9: PL spectra of (a) non-doped QDs and (b) one of the doped QDs deconvoluted into energy coordinates b...
Figure 10: (a) Evolution of the excitonic peak with increasing Mnom; (b) evolution of the defect peak with inc...
Figure 11: Comparison of typical excitation, PL and UV–vis absorption spectra.
Figure 12: The scheme of PL formation with participation of Zn levels.
Figure 13: Normalized PL spectra of three samples: non-doped etched with HF, doped with Zn and etched with HF,...